TFL - Count the passes - (2008) :30 (UK)

From director Chris Palmer at Gorgeous and Ad agency WCRS, London comes this old idea.
And by old, I mean yes I've seen it before - you knew I was going to say that didn't you?
Well tough titties, I did back in 1999 when Daniel J. Simons used the same exact trick in his visual cognition lab. Still, it's a very good trick isn't it? Not sure I can be bothered to Badland this, what say you?
Ad Agency: WCRS, London.
Leon Juame (Executive Creative Director)
Yan elliott / Luke Williamson (Creative Director)
Kit Dayaram / Vince Chasteauneuf (Art Director)
Tom Spicer / Simon Aldridge (Copywriter)
James Lethem (Agency Producer)
Laura Crowther (Assistant Producer)
Director: Chris Palmer
Paul Watts (Editor)
Prod. Co.:Gorgeous
- Login to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
Technorati Tags: 






Blimey! Are they by any chance related?
I dunno, it's a bit like Badlanding that old image which is a vase and/or two faces isn't it? Though in the case of Daniel J's work, I was very aware that these tests (filmed like that) are his copyright, and have never seen them before he filmed them. Unlike that vase/face thing where I have no idea who did that first, it's probably as old as the sun. More of his neat demos here btw. The difference is really that one has a man in a gorilla suit, and one has a dude in a bear/bunny suit.
It's a great idea either way but I think to make the cyclist connection they could at the very least stick a bike-helmet on that bears head. Is Daniel J. Simons getting any compensation for this?
Brandrepublic says that he's suing:
This is just wild guessing, really, since anyone can get a film removed from youtube if it wasn't posted by the Transport for London* peeps and/or agency/production house themselves.
* who obviously own the copyright of their own film and might not want it on youtube
But - the only thing I saw was the moonwalking bear...
I should've checked todays: WCRS defends video against copyright accusation
*** First time I saw the segment.
There were other similar segments, one where a man ran into a classroom and stole something from the professor's table in the front of the room, and ran out. [IIRC, he was brandishing a weapon]. Of the 30+ students/witnesses, most of them got the following wrong: his clothing (types of clothes, patterns, colors, etc.); whether he was wearing a hat or not; whether he was wearing glasses; what color his hair was; and even what race he was. (I got 87% right - I had some problems with clothing specifics - colors, whether he was wearing jeans or something else). There were almost no reliable witnesses.
Allan...